linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: core: Allow the state change from SDEV_QUIESCE to SDEV

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200421085844.GA284628@T590>
Date:   Tue, 21 Apr 2020 16:58:44 +0800
From:   Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
To:     Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
Cc:     "martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        "bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
        "hch@....de" <hch@....de>,
        "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "hare@...e.de" <hare@...e.de>,
        Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: core: Allow the state change from SDEV_QUIESCE to
 SDEV_BLOCK

On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 03:01:34AM +0000, Dexuan Cui wrote:
> > From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>
> > Sent: Friday, April 17, 2020 7:42 PM
> > To: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
> > Cc: jejb@...ux.ibm.com; martin.petersen@...cle.com;
> > linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; hch@....de;
> > bvanassche@....org; hare@...e.de; Michael Kelley
> > <mikelley@...rosoft.com>; Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: core: Allow the state change from SDEV_QUIESCE to
> > SDEV_BLOCK
> > 
> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 05:40:45PM -0700, Dexuan Cui wrote:
> > > The APIs scsi_host_block()/scsi_host_unblock() are recently added by:
> > > 2bb955840c1d ("scsi: core: add scsi_host_(block,unblock) helper function")
> > > and so far the APIs are only used by:
> > > 3d3ca53b1639 ("scsi: aacraid: use scsi_host_(block,unblock) to block I/O")
> > >
> > > However, from reading the code, I think the APIs don't really work for
> > > aacraid, because, in the resume path of hibernation, when aac_suspend() ->
> > > scsi_host_block() is called, scsi_device_quiesce() has set the state to
> > > SDEV_QUIESCE, so aac_suspend() -> scsi_host_block() returns -EINVAL.
> > >
> > > Fix the issue by allowing the state change.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 2bb955840c1d ("scsi: core: add scsi_host_(block,unblock) helper
> > function")
> > > Signed-off-by: Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 1 +
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > > index 47835c4b4ee0..06c260f6cdae 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
> > > @@ -2284,6 +2284,7 @@ scsi_device_set_state(struct scsi_device *sdev,
> > enum scsi_device_state state)
> > >  		switch (oldstate) {
> > >  		case SDEV_RUNNING:
> > >  		case SDEV_CREATED_BLOCK:
> > > +		case SDEV_QUIESCE:
> > >  		case SDEV_OFFLINE:
> > >  			break;
> > >  		default:
> > 
> > Looks reasonable because SDEV_BLOCK is one more strict state than
> > QEIESCE, so:
> 
> Thanks, Ming!
> 
> > Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...ha.com>
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Ming
> 
> There should be a small typo: s/redha/redhat :-)

Sorry for the fault:

Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>

Thanks,
Ming