[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200421124703.149466-1-colin.king@canonical.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 13:47:03 +0100
From: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To: Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>,
Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH][next] btrfs: fix check for memory allocation failure of ret->path
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Currently the memory allocation failure check for ret->path is checking
that ret is null rather than ret->path. Fix this by checking ret->path
instead.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Dereference null return")
Fixes: bd8bdc532152 ("btrfs: backref: introduce the skeleton of btrfs_backref_iter")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
---
fs/btrfs/backref.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
index 60a69f7c0b36..78e6c9a64212 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/backref.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
@@ -2307,7 +2307,7 @@ struct btrfs_backref_iter *btrfs_backref_iter_alloc(
return NULL;
ret->path = btrfs_alloc_path();
- if (!ret) {
+ if (!ret->path) {
kfree(ret);
return NULL;
}
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists