[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a6b24f6e-1611-91a9-2f02-ff852af0b51a@suse.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 20:48:28 +0800
From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>,
<linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] btrfs: fix check for memory allocation failure of
ret->path
On 2020/4/21 下午8:47, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> Currently the memory allocation failure check for ret->path is checking
> that ret is null rather than ret->path. Fix this by checking ret->path
> instead.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Dereference null return")
> Fixes: bd8bdc532152 ("btrfs: backref: introduce the skeleton of btrfs_backref_iter")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
My bad.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
Thanks,
Qu
> ---
> fs/btrfs/backref.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/backref.c b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
> index 60a69f7c0b36..78e6c9a64212 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/backref.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/backref.c
> @@ -2307,7 +2307,7 @@ struct btrfs_backref_iter *btrfs_backref_iter_alloc(
> return NULL;
>
> ret->path = btrfs_alloc_path();
> - if (!ret) {
> + if (!ret->path) {
> kfree(ret);
> return NULL;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists