[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLW13oA376bqj7uTR4E4zmnX5ASK=rpqw3HMr4yOWQGaOw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 13:45:49 -0700
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Eugeniu Rosca <roscaeugeniu@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] driver core: Improve and cleanup driver_deferred_probe_check_state()
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 12:54 AM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 06:16:31PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
>
> > The second reverts the default timeout back to 0:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200413204253.84991-1-john.stultz@linaro.org/
>
> If you're reverting the timeout we should revert the regulator change
> too I think.
Maybe? The main issue for me was my change was clearly breaking users
with dts with missing dependencies where their setup was working
before. I sort of feel like having a dtb with missing dependencies is
less valid than wanting to load module dependencies from userland, but
they were working first, so we have to keep them happy :) And at least
now the latter can add the timeout boot argument to make it work.
For your case, I'm not sure if the timeout would run afoul on the nfs
root mounting case this one tripped over.
thanks
-john
Powered by blists - more mailing lists