linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] driver core: Improve and cleanup driver_deferred_probe_check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVoubQWoDcmLTMw9ADxboTxHDtb+90fpKM=GX14_a6TxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Apr 2020 09:26:20 +0200
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
        Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@...adit-jv.com>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
        Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
        Todd Kjos <tkjos@...gle.com>,
        Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eugeniu Rosca <roscaeugeniu@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] driver core: Improve and cleanup driver_deferred_probe_check_state()

Hi John,

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:46 PM John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 12:54 AM Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 06:16:31PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> > > The second reverts the default timeout back to 0:
> > >   https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200413204253.84991-1-john.stultz@linaro.org/
> >
> > If you're reverting the timeout we should revert the regulator change
> > too I think.
>
> Maybe? The main issue for me was my change was clearly breaking users
> with dts with missing dependencies where their setup was working
> before. I sort of feel like having a dtb with missing dependencies is
> less valid than wanting to load module dependencies from userland, but
> they were working first, so we have to keep them happy :) And at least
> now the latter can add the timeout boot argument to make it work.

IOMMU support is optional.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds