[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <158755121629.159702.14849607096816306080@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 03:26:56 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, a.hajda@...sung.com,
airlied@...ux.ie, bgolaszewski@...libre.com, daniel@...ll.ch,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, narmstrong@...libre.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, spanda@...eaurora.org
Cc: jonas@...boo.se, jeffrey.l.hugo@...il.com,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
jernej.skrabec@...l.net, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
robdclark@...omium.org, Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] arm64: dts: sdm845: Add "no-hpd" to sn65dsi86 on cheza
Quoting Douglas Anderson (2020-04-20 22:06:22)
> We don't have the HPD line hooked up to the bridge chip. Add it as
> suggested in the patch ("dt-bindings: drm/bridge: ti-sn65dsi86:
> Document no-hpd").
>
> NOTE: this patch isn't expected to have any effect but just keeps us
> cleaner for the future. Currently the driver in Linux just assumes
> that nobody has HPD hooked up. This change allows us to later
> implement HPD support in the driver without messing up sdm845-cheza.
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists