linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Changes in w1_therm.c and adding w1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <32dbb39debedabd6dbd1a8675760e171c180de9e.camel@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Apr 2020 19:59:18 +0200
From:   Akira shimahara <akira215corp@...il.com>
To:     Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Changes in w1_therm.c and adding w1_therm.h

Le jeudi 23 avril 2020 à 20:07 +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov a écrit :
> Hi
> 
> 23.04.2020, 17:41, "Greg KH" <greg@...ah.com>:
> > You do not document any of these new sysfs files, why not?
> 
> Looks like there are bigger isues with the patch that I've missed,
> and if I understood correctly, Akira asked to drop this patch
Hi,

Evgeniy, I don't asked to drop this patch, sorry for the
misunderstanding. I will add entries to Documentation/ABI/testing/ by
the end of the week and submit a new patch. Who should I add in the
'Contact' field ?

To answer Greg's comments, we use the kernel subsystems as much as
possible, but for timing and bus protocol reasons, we have to go a
little deeper and control bus transaction as close as possible.

Evgeniy, could you detail the issues you are talking about so I can
adjust if required ?

Thanks again for you time, regards

Akira Shimahara