linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Changes in w1_therm.c and adding w1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 23 Apr 2020 21:16:03 +0300
From:   Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
To:     Akira shimahara <akira215corp@...il.com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Changes in w1_therm.c and adding w1_therm.h

Hi

23.04.2020, 20:59, "Akira shimahara" <akira215corp@...il.com>:
> Le jeudi 23 avril 2020 à 20:07 +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov a écrit :
>>  Looks like there are bigger isues with the patch that I've missed,
>>  and if I understood correctly, Akira asked to drop this patch
>
> Hi,
>
> Evgeniy, I don't asked to drop this patch, sorry for the
> misunderstanding. I will add entries to Documentation/ABI/testing/ by
> the end of the week and submit a new patch. Who should I add in the
> 'Contact' field ?

I think there should be your email

> To answer Greg's comments, we use the kernel subsystems as much as
> possible, but for timing and bus protocol reasons, we have to go a
> little deeper and control bus transaction as close as possible.
>
> Evgeniy, could you detail the issues you are talking about so I can
> adjust if required ?

I was referring to the mail where you said it was a mistake and I should delete that mail,
but apparently this is just a miscommuncation. I was surprised, because I didn't caught
any significant issues with the patch.