[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1587683028.111002229@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:03:57 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
"Lukas Czerner" <lczerner@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 010/245] ext4: wait for existing dio workers in
ext4_alloc_file_blocks()
3.16.83-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
commit 0d306dcf86e8f065dff42a4a934ae9d99af35ba5 upstream.
Currently existing dio workers can jump in and potentially increase
extent tree depth while we're allocating blocks in
ext4_alloc_file_blocks(). This may cause us to underestimate the
number of credits needed for the transaction because the extent tree
depth can change after our estimation.
Fix this by waiting for all the existing dio workers in the same way
as we do it in ext4_punch_hole. We've seen errors caused by this in
xfstest generic/299, however it's really hard to reproduce.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
fs/ext4/extents.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -4707,6 +4707,10 @@ static int ext4_alloc_file_blocks(struct
if (len <= EXT_UNWRITTEN_MAX_LEN)
flags |= EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_NO_NORMALIZE;
+ /* Wait all existing dio workers, newcomers will block on i_mutex */
+ ext4_inode_block_unlocked_dio(inode);
+ inode_dio_wait(inode);
+
/*
* credits to insert 1 extent into extent tree
*/
@@ -4756,6 +4760,8 @@ retry:
goto retry;
}
+ ext4_inode_resume_unlocked_dio(inode);
+
return ret > 0 ? ret2 : ret;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists