[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1587683028.711032763@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 00:05:47 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Denis Kirjanov <kda@...ux-powerpc.org>,
"David Sterba" <dsterba@...e.com>,
"Lu Fengqi" <lufq.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.16 120/245] btrfs: Remove redundant btrfs_release_path
from btrfs_unlink_subvol
3.16.83-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
commit 5b7d687ad5913a56b6a8788435d7a53990b4176d upstream.
Although it is safe to call this on already released paths with no locks
held or extent buffers, removing the redundant btrfs_release_path is
reasonable.
Signed-off-by: Lu Fengqi <lufq.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16 as dependency of commit d49d3287e74f
"btrfs: fix invalid removal of root ref"]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -4031,7 +4031,6 @@ int btrfs_unlink_subvol(struct btrfs_tra
leaf = path->nodes[0];
btrfs_item_key_to_cpu(leaf, &key, path->slots[0]);
- btrfs_release_path(path);
index = key.offset;
}
btrfs_release_path(path);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists