[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200423233824.GC4088835@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 16:38:25 -0700
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V10 10/11] fs: Introduce DCACHE_DONTCACHE
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 08:57:34AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 02:21:01PM -0700, ira.weiny@...el.com wrote:
> > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> >
> > DCACHE_DONTCACHE indicates a dentry should not be cached on final
> > dput().
> >
> > Also add a helper function to mark DCACHE_DONTCACHE on all dentries
> > pointing to a specific inode when that inode is being set I_DONTCACHE.
> >
> > This facilitates dropping dentry references to inodes sooner which
> > require eviction to swap S_DAX mode.
> >
> > Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> > Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
>
> Code looks fine....
>
> > --- a/fs/inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/inode.c
> > @@ -1526,6 +1526,21 @@ int generic_delete_inode(struct inode *inode)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(generic_delete_inode);
> >
> > +void mark_inode_dontcache(struct inode *inode)
> > +{
> > + struct dentry *de;
> > +
> > + spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> > + hlist_for_each_entry(de, &inode->i_dentry, d_u.d_alias) {
> > + spin_lock(&de->d_lock);
> > + de->d_flags |= DCACHE_DONTCACHE;
> > + spin_unlock(&de->d_lock);
> > + }
> > + inode->i_state |= I_DONTCACHE;
> > + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(mark_inode_dontcache);
>
> Though I suspect that this should be in fs/dcache.c and not
> fs/inode.c. i.e. nothing in fs/inode.c does dentry list walks, but
> there are several cases in the dcache code where inode dentry walks
> are done under the inode lock (e.g. d_find_alias(inode)).
>
> So perhaps this should be d_mark_dontcache(inode), which also marks
> the inode as I_DONTCACHE so that everything is evicted on last
> reference...
That does follow an existing pattern.
Al? Any preference?
Ira
>
> Cheers,
>
> Dave.
> --
> Dave Chinner
> david@...morbit.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists