linux-kernel - RE: [ANNOUNCE] exfatprogs-1.0.2 version released

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <000101d619c8$5c6e3b90$154ab2b0$@samsung.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Apr 2020 08:38:58 +0900
From:   "Namjae Jeon" <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
To:     "'Goldwyn Rodrigues'" <rgoldwyn@...e.de>
Cc:     "'LKML'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "'Hyunchul Lee'" <hyc.lee@...il.com>,
        "'Eric Sandeen'" <sandeen@...deen.net>,
        "'Sedat Dilek'" <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [ANNOUNCE] exfatprogs-1.0.2 version released

> Hi Namjae,
Hi Goldwyn,
> 
> On 17:49 23/04, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> > This is the second release of exfatprogs since the initial version(1.0.1).
> > We have received various feedbacks and patches since the previous
> > release and applied them in this release. Thanks for feedback and patches!
> >
> > According to Goldwyn's comments, We renamed the project name from
> > exfat-utils to exfatprogs. However, There is an opinion that just
> > renaming the name is not enough. Because the binary names(mkfs.exfat,
> > fsck.exfat) still are same with ones in current exfat-utils RPM package.
> >
> > If that's real problem, We are considering a long jump with 2.0.0 when
> > adding repair feature.
> >
> > Any feedback is welcome!:)
> 
> I agree with Eric. We can add "Conflicts" flag to make sure there are conflicting capabilities in
> packages.
Okay.
> 
> >
> > The major changes in this release:
> >  * Rename project name to exfatprogs.
> >  * label.exfat: Add support for label.exfat to set/get exfat volume label.
> >  * Replace iconv library by standard C functions mbstowcs() and wcrtomb().
> >  * Fix the build warnings/errors and add warning options.
> >  * Fix several bugs(memory leak, wrong endian conversion, zero out
> > beyond end of file) and cleanup codes
> >  * Fix issues on big endian system and on 32bit system.
> >  * Add support for Android build system.
> >
> > The git tree is at:
> >
> > https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=c2ec59b9-9f266c0e-c2edd2f6-0cc47a30
> > 03e8-e469846ab6add112&q=1&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fexfatprogs%2Fex
> > fatprogs
> >
> > The tarballs can be found at:
> >
> > https://protect2.fireeye.com/url?k=88473660-d58d03d7-8846bd2f-0cc47a30
> > 03e8-7bb3906eafbb32bc&q=1&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fexfatprogs%2Fex
> > fatprogs%2Freleases%2Ftag%2F1.0.2
> >
> 
> Can we follow the standard of source tarballs be <projectname>-<version>.tar.gz? In this case, exfat-
> 1.0.2.tar.gz instead of 1.0.2.tar.gz?
Ah, When I tried to download it through this link, source tarballs was exfatprogs-1.0.2.tar.gz...
Am I missing something ?
> 
> --
> Goldwyn