[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200423144411.hmby6ux2utdrqsls@fiona>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 09:44:11 -0500
From: 'Goldwyn Rodrigues' <rgoldwyn@...e.de>
To: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
Cc: 'LKML' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, 'Hyunchul Lee' <hyc.lee@...il.com>,
'Eric Sandeen' <sandeen@...deen.net>,
'Sedat Dilek' <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] exfatprogs-1.0.2 version released
Hi Namjae,
On 17:49 23/04, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> This is the second release of exfatprogs since the initial version(1.0.1).
> We have received various feedbacks and patches since the previous release
> and applied them in this release. Thanks for feedback and patches!
>
> According to Goldwyn's comments, We renamed the project name from
> exfat-utils to exfatprogs. However, There is an opinion that just renaming
> the name is not enough. Because the binary names(mkfs.exfat, fsck.exfat)
> still are same with ones in current exfat-utils RPM package.
>
> If that's real problem, We are considering a long jump with 2.0.0 when adding
> repair feature.
>
> Any feedback is welcome!:)
I agree with Eric. We can add "Conflicts" flag to make sure there are
conflicting capabilities in packages.
>
> The major changes in this release:
> * Rename project name to exfatprogs.
> * label.exfat: Add support for label.exfat to set/get exfat volume label.
> * Replace iconv library by standard C functions mbstowcs() and wcrtomb().
> * Fix the build warnings/errors and add warning options.
> * Fix several bugs(memory leak, wrong endian conversion, zero out beyond end of file) and cleanup codes
> * Fix issues on big endian system and on 32bit system.
> * Add support for Android build system.
>
> The git tree is at:
> https://github.com/exfatprogs/exfatprogs
>
> The tarballs can be found at:
> https://github.com/exfatprogs/exfatprogs/releases/tag/1.0.2
>
Can we follow the standard of source tarballs be
<projectname>-<version>.tar.gz? In this case, exfat-1.0.2.tar.gz
instead of 1.0.2.tar.gz?
--
Goldwyn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists