linux-kernel - [PATCH] :ssb sprom.c: Fixed block comments coding style issues

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 24 Apr 2020 18:50:43 +0100
From:   John Oldman <john.oldman@...ehill.co.uk>
To:     m@...s.ch
Cc:     linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        John Oldman <john.oldman@...ehill.co.uk>
Subject: [PATCH] :ssb sprom.c: Fixed block comments coding style issues

Fixed coding style issues

Signed-off-by: John Oldman <john.oldman@...ehill.co.uk>
---
 drivers/ssb/sprom.c | 12 ++++++++----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ssb/sprom.c b/drivers/ssb/sprom.c
index 52d2e0f33be7..42d620cee8a9 100644
--- a/drivers/ssb/sprom.c
+++ b/drivers/ssb/sprom.c
@@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ ssize_t ssb_attr_sprom_show(struct ssb_bus *bus, char *buf,
 
 	/* Use interruptible locking, as the SPROM write might
 	 * be holding the lock for several seconds. So allow userspace
-	 * to cancel operation. */
+	 * to cancel operation.
+	 */
 	err = -ERESTARTSYS;
 	if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&bus->sprom_mutex))
 		goto out_kfree;
@@ -121,7 +122,8 @@ ssize_t ssb_attr_sprom_store(struct ssb_bus *bus,
 
 	/* Use interruptible locking, as the SPROM write might
 	 * be holding the lock for several seconds. So allow userspace
-	 * to cancel operation. */
+	 * to cancel operation.
+	 */
 	err = -ERESTARTSYS;
 	if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&bus->sprom_mutex))
 		goto out_kfree;
@@ -188,9 +190,11 @@ int ssb_fill_sprom_with_fallback(struct ssb_bus *bus, struct ssb_sprom *out)
 bool ssb_is_sprom_available(struct ssb_bus *bus)
 {
 	/* status register only exists on chipcomon rev >= 11 and we need check
-	   for >= 31 only */
+	 * for >= 31 only
+	 */
 	/* this routine differs from specs as we do not access SPROM directly
-	   on PCMCIA */
+	 * on PCMCIA
+	 */
 	if (bus->bustype == SSB_BUSTYPE_PCI &&
 	    bus->chipco.dev &&	/* can be unavailable! */
 	    bus->chipco.dev->id.revision >= 31)
-- 
2.17.1