linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] rcuwait: Introduce rcuwait

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200424095533.GY20730@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Fri, 24 Apr 2020 11:55:33 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, pbonzini@...hat.com, maz@...nel.org,
        bigeasy@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, will@...nel.org,
        joel@...lfernandes.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] rcuwait: Introduce rcuwait_active()

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:48:36PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> This call is lockless and thus should not be trustedblindly,
> ie: for wakeup purposes, which is already provided correctly
> by rcuwait_wakeup().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>