linux-kernel - Re: [net-next PATCH v1 2/2] phylink: introduce phylink_fwnode_phy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75Vftq3OEEC5DfW8CgV4yQKZ3doD-r6khXxgn0oOmrLnLkA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Apr 2020 12:56:37 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@....nxp.com>
Cc:     linux.cj@...il.com, Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Cristi Sovaiala <cristian.sovaiala@....com>,
        Florin Laurentiu Chiculita <florinlaurentiu.chiculita@....com>,
        Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
        Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....nxp.com>,
        Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Diana Madalina Craciun <diana.craciun@....com>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.bansal@....com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Varun Sethi <V.Sethi@....com>,
        Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
        Makarand Pawagi <makarand.pawagi@....com>,
        "Rajesh V . Bikkina" <rajesh.bikkina@....com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v1 2/2] phylink: introduce phylink_fwnode_phy_connect()

On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 6:17 AM Calvin Johnson
<calvin.johnson@....nxp.com> wrote:
>
> Define phylink_fwnode_phy_connect() to connect phy specified by
> a fwnode to a phylink instance. This function will handle both
> DT and ACPI nodes.

>  #include <linux/spinlock.h>
>  #include <linux/timer.h>
>  #include <linux/workqueue.h>
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>

Looks like broken order.

> +       if (is_of_node(fwnode)) {
> +       } else if (is_acpi_node(fwnode)) {
> +       }

I'm wondering if there is an API that allows you to drop all this
stuff. In property provider agnostic code we really don't want to see
this.

> +       if (!phy_dev)
> +               return -ENODEV;

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko