[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5f8de7da-9d5c-0115-04b5-9f08be0b34b0@amazon.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 14:56:21 +0200
From: Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"Paraschiv, Andra-Irina" <andraprs@...zon.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...zon.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...zon.com>,
Colm MacCarthaigh <colmmacc@...zon.com>,
Bjoern Doebel <doebel@...zon.de>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw@...zon.co.uk>,
Frank van der Linden <fllinden@...zon.com>,
Martin Pohlack <mpohlack@...zon.de>,
Matt Wilson <msw@...zon.com>, Balbir Singh <sblbir@...zon.com>,
Stewart Smith <trawets@...zon.com>,
Uwe Dannowski <uwed@...zon.de>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<ne-devel-upstream@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/15] Add support for Nitro Enclaves
On 23.04.20 23:18, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 23/04/20 22:56, Alexander Graf wrote:
>>>
>>> CPL3 is how the user application run, but does the enclave's Linux boot
>>> process start in real mode at the reset vector (0xfffffff0), in 16-bit
>>> protected mode at the Linux bzImage entry point, or at the ELF entry
>>> point?
>>
>> There is no "entry point" per se. You prepopulate at target bzImage into
>> the enclave memory on boot which then follows the standard boot
>> protocol. Everything
>
> There's still a "where" missing in that sentence. :) I assume you put
> it at 0x10000 (and so the entry point at 0x10200)? That should be
> documented because that is absolutely not what the KVM API looks like.
Yes, that part is not documented in the patch set, correct. I would
personally just make an example user space binary the documentation for
now. Later we will publish a proper device specification outside of the
Linux ecosystem which will describe the register layout and image
loading semantics in verbatim, so that other OSs can implement the
driver too.
To answer the question though, the target file is in a newly invented
file format called "EIF" and it needs to be loaded at offset 0x800000 of
the address space donated to the enclave.
>
>> before that (enclave firmware, etc.) is provided by
>> the enclave environment.
>>
>> Think of it like a mechanism to launch a second QEMU instance on the
>> host, but all you can actually control are the -smp, -m, -kernel and
>> -initrd parameters.
>
> Are there requirements on how to populate the memory to ensure that the
> host firmware doesn't crash and burn? E.g. some free memory right below
> 4GiB (for the firmware, the LAPIC/IOAPIC or any other special MMIO
> devices you have, PCI BARs, and the like)?
No, the target memory layout is currently disconnected from the memory
layout defined through the KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION ioctl. While we do
check that guest_phys_addr is contiguous, the underlying device API does
not have any notion of a "guest address" - all it gets is a
scatter-gather sliced bucket of memory.
>> The only I/O channel you have between your VM and
>> that new VM is a vsock channel which is configured by the host on your
>> behalf.
>
> Is this virtio-mmio or virtio-pci, and what other emulated devices are
> there and how do you discover them? Are there any ISA devices
> (RTC/PIC/PIT), and are there SMBIOS/RSDP/MP tables in the F segment?
It is virtio-mmio for the enclave and virtio-pci for the parent. The
enclave is a microvm.
For more details on the enclave device topology, we'll have to wait for
the public documentation that describes the enclave view of the world
though. I don't think that one's public quite yet. This patch set is
about the parent's view.
Alex
Amazon Development Center Germany GmbH
Krausenstr. 38
10117 Berlin
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Christian Schlaeger, Jonathan Weiss
Eingetragen am Amtsgericht Charlottenburg unter HRB 149173 B
Sitz: Berlin
Ust-ID: DE 289 237 879
Powered by blists - more mailing lists