linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] firmware_loader: re-export fw_fallback_config into firmware

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200424023108.GA11244@42.do-not-panic.com>
Date:   Fri, 24 Apr 2020 02:31:08 +0000
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        josh@...htriplett.org, rishabhb@...eaurora.org, maco@...roid.com,
        andy.gross@...aro.org, david.brown@...aro.org,
        bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        keescook@...omium.org, shuah@...nel.org, mfuzzey@...keon.com,
        zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
        pali.rohar@...il.com, tiwai@...e.de, arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com,
        zajec5@...il.com, nbroeking@...com, markivx@...eaurora.org,
        broonie@...nel.org, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, Abhay_Salunke@...l.com,
        jewalt@...innovations.com, cantabile.desu@...il.com, ast@...com,
        andresx7@...il.com, dan.rue@...aro.org, brendanhiggins@...gle.com,
        yzaikin@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware_loader: re-export fw_fallback_config into
 firmware_loader's own namespace

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 07:27:16PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 02:14:20 +0000 Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 06:05:44PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 20:31:40 +0000 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:  
> > > > From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
> > > > 
> > > > Christoph's recent patch "firmware_loader: remove unused exports", which
> > > > is not merged upstream yet, removed two exported symbols. One is fine to
> > > > remove since only built-in code uses it but the other is incorrect.
> > > > 
> > > > If CONFIG_FW_LOADER=m so the firmware_loader is modular but
> > > > CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER=y we fail at mostpost with:
> > > > 
> > > > ERROR: modpost: "fw_fallback_config" [drivers/base/firmware_loader/firmware_class.ko] undefined!
> > > > 
> > > > This happens because the variable fw_fallback_config is built into the
> > > > kernel if CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER=y always, so we need to grant
> > > > access to the firmware loader module by exporting it.
> > > > 
> > > > Instead of just exporting it as we used to, take advantage of the new
> > > > kernel symbol namespacing functionality, and export the symbol only to
> > > > the firmware loader private namespace. This would prevent misuses from
> > > > other drivers and makes it clear the goal is to keep this private to
> > > > the firmware loader alone.
> > > > 
> > > > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> > > > Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> > > > Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> > > > Fixes: "firmware_loader: remove unused exports"  
> > > 
> > > Can't help but notice this strange form of the Fixes tag, is it
> > > intentional?  
> > 
> > Yeah, no there is no commit for the patch as the commit is ephemeral in
> > a development tree not yet upstream, ie, not on Linus' tree yet. Using a
> > commit here then makes no sense unless one wants to use a reference
> > development tree in this case, as development trees are expected to
> > rebase to move closer towards Linus' tree. When a tree rebases, the
> > commit IDs change, and this is why the commit is ephemeral unless
> > one uses a base tree / branch / tag.
> 
> I'd think that either the commit is rebase-able and the fix can be
> squashed into it, or it's not and it has a stable commit id. 
> But I guess it may get tricky around the edges..

I'll let Greg decide ;)

I did my part.

  Luis