[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AM6PR04MB496669637FE86E928B9E0EBE80D00@AM6PR04MB4966.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 02:32:32 +0000
From: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>
To: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk" <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] firmware: imx: MU IRQ group number should be 7
> From: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
> Sent: Friday, April 24, 2020 7:07 AM
>
> The MU IRQ group number should be 7 instead of 4.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
Are we using others IRQ group?
If not, this change may slow down the irq handling speed.
Regards
Aisheng
> ---
> drivers/firmware/imx/imx-scu-irq.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/imx/imx-scu-irq.c
> b/drivers/firmware/imx/imx-scu-irq.c
> index d9dcc20..66fef88 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/imx/imx-scu-irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/imx/imx-scu-irq.c
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
>
> #define IMX_SC_IRQ_FUNC_ENABLE 1
> #define IMX_SC_IRQ_FUNC_STATUS 2
> -#define IMX_SC_IRQ_NUM_GROUP 4
> +#define IMX_SC_IRQ_NUM_GROUP 7
>
> static u32 mu_resource_id;
>
> --
> 2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists