[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB3PR0402MB3916D588A9432A9F1D1F99BAF5D00@DB3PR0402MB3916.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 02:32:55 +0000
From: Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>
To: Aisheng Dong <aisheng.dong@....com>,
"jassisinghbrar@...il.com" <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] mailbox: imx: Add context save/restore for suspend/resume
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] mailbox: imx: Add context save/restore for
> suspend/resume
>
> > From: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
> > Sent: Friday, April 24, 2020 7:01 AM
> >
> > For "mem" mode suspend on i.MX8 SoCs, MU settings could be lost
> > because its power is off, so save/restore is needed for MU settings during
> suspend/resume.
> > However, the restore can ONLY be done when MU settings are actually
> > lost, for the scenario of settings NOT lost in "freeze" mode suspend,
> > since there could be still IPC going on multiple CPUs, restoring the
> > MU settings could overwrite the TIE by mistake and cause system
> > freeze, so need to make sure ONLY restore the MU settings when it is
> powered off.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anson Huang <Anson.Huang@....com>
>
> As mentioned before, we'd better keep the original author.
>
> > ---
> > drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c | 35
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> > b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c index 97bf0ac..b53cf63 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> > @@ -67,6 +67,8 @@ struct imx_mu_priv {
> > struct clk *clk;
> > int irq;
> >
> > + u32 xcr;
> > +
> > bool side_b;
> > };
> >
> > @@ -583,12 +585,45 @@ static const struct of_device_id imx_mu_dt_ids[]
> > = { }; MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_mu_dt_ids);
> >
> > +static int imx_mu_suspend_noirq(struct device *dev) {
> > + struct imx_mu_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > +
> > + priv->xcr = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int imx_mu_resume_noirq(struct device *dev) {
> > + struct imx_mu_priv *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * ONLY restore MU when context lost, the TIE could
> > + * be set during noirq resume as there is MU data
> > + * communication going on, and restore the saved
> > + * value will overwrite the TIE and cause MU data
> > + * send failed, may lead to system freeze. This issue
> > + * is observed by testing freeze mode suspend.
> > + */
> > + if (!imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR))
> > + imx_mu_write(priv, priv->xcr, priv->dcfg->xCR);
>
> This could be separate patch if it aims to fix a specific corner case.
This is NOT corner case, it can be reproduced with our imx_5.4.y very
easily, and this issue cause me many days to debug...Also cause Clark's
effort to help test it a lot for many days...
I do NOT think it makes sense to first send out your patch with bug for review,
And then add another patch to fix it. 1 patch is enough for this feature.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists