linux-kernel - [PATCH] pinctrl: samsung: Save/restore eint_mask over suspend for EINT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BN6PR04MB06600C848C2C1531F73DAD7BA3D10@BN6PR04MB0660.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Sat, 25 Apr 2020 16:10:46 -0700
From:   Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@...e.ca>
To:     tomasz.figa@...il.com, krzk@...nel.org, s.nawrocki@...sung.com,
        linus.walleij@...aro.org, kgene@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@...e.ca>
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: samsung: Save/restore eint_mask over suspend for EINT_TYPE GPIOs

Currently, for EINT_TYPE GPIOs, the CON and FLTCON registers
are saved and restored over a suspend/resume cycle.  However, the
EINT_MASK registers are not.

On S5PV210 at the very least, these registers are not retained over
suspend, leading to the interrupts remaining masked upon resume and
therefore no interrupts being triggered for the device.  There should
be no effect on any SoCs that do retain these registers as theoretically
we would just be re-writing what was already there.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@...e.ca>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c | 9 +++++++++
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c
index 0599f5127b01..e6ddb54afaf2 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/samsung/pinctrl-exynos.c
@@ -265,6 +265,7 @@ struct exynos_eint_gpio_save {
 	u32 eint_con;
 	u32 eint_fltcon0;
 	u32 eint_fltcon1;
+	u32 eint_mask;
 };
 
 /*
@@ -608,10 +609,13 @@ static void exynos_pinctrl_suspend_bank(
 						+ 2 * bank->eint_offset);
 	save->eint_fltcon1 = readl(regs + EXYNOS_GPIO_EFLTCON_OFFSET
 						+ 2 * bank->eint_offset + 4);
+	save->eint_mask = readl(regs + bank->irq_chip->eint_mask
+						+ bank->eint_offset);
 
 	pr_debug("%s: save     con %#010x\n", bank->name, save->eint_con);
 	pr_debug("%s: save fltcon0 %#010x\n", bank->name, save->eint_fltcon0);
 	pr_debug("%s: save fltcon1 %#010x\n", bank->name, save->eint_fltcon1);
+	pr_debug("%s: save    mask %#010x\n", bank->name, save->eint_mask);
 }
 
 void exynos_pinctrl_suspend(struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *drvdata)
@@ -653,6 +657,9 @@ static void exynos_pinctrl_resume_bank(
 	pr_debug("%s: fltcon1 %#010x => %#010x\n", bank->name,
 			readl(regs + EXYNOS_GPIO_EFLTCON_OFFSET
 			+ 2 * bank->eint_offset + 4), save->eint_fltcon1);
+	pr_debug("%s:    mask %#010x => %#010x\n", bank->name,
+			readl(regs + bank->irq_chip->eint_mask
+			+ bank->eint_offset), save->eint_mask);
 
 	writel(save->eint_con, regs + EXYNOS_GPIO_ECON_OFFSET
 						+ bank->eint_offset);
@@ -660,6 +667,8 @@ static void exynos_pinctrl_resume_bank(
 						+ 2 * bank->eint_offset);
 	writel(save->eint_fltcon1, regs + EXYNOS_GPIO_EFLTCON_OFFSET
 						+ 2 * bank->eint_offset + 4);
+	writel(save->eint_mask, regs + bank->irq_chip->eint_mask
+						+ bank->eint_offset);
 }
 
 void exynos_pinctrl_resume(struct samsung_pinctrl_drv_data *drvdata)
-- 
2.20.1