[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <07a820a2-b3b3-32ca-75ce-ceaca106d2c6@web.de>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:38:23 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Sayali Lokhande <sayalil@...eaurora.org>,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH V2] f2fs: Avoid double lock for cp_rwsem during
checkpoint
> … This results in deadlock as
> iput() tries to hold cp_rwsem, which is already held at the
> beginning by checkpoint->block_operations().
Will another imperative wording become helpful besides the provided information
for this change description?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?id=6a8b55ed4056ea5559ebe4f6a4b247f627870d4c#n151
Would you like to add the tag “Fixes” because of adjustments
for the data synchronisation?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists