[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0e840b20-c215-f446-b467-476d913005d1@codeaurora.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 18:23:53 +0530
From: Jishnu Prakash <jprakash@...eaurora.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: agross@...nel.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mka@...omium.org, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, smohanad@...eaurora.org,
kgunda@...eaurora.org, aghayal@...eaurora.org,
Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm-owner@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/3] iio: adc: Convert the QCOM SPMI ADC bindings to
.yaml format
Hi Jonathan
On 4/18/2020 9:52 PM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 14:47:44 +0530
> Jishnu Prakash <jprakash@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
>> Convert the adc bindings from .txt to .yaml format.
>>
> I read patch 2 before this one for some reason but same question applies here
> Given we are now enforcing a lot of the values explicitly are we better
> off dropping the text description of that. It looks to me like a potential
> place to get out of sync given the information is a bit further down.
I'll remove the redundant parts of the descriptions in the next post.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists