linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mtd: spi-nor: Add support for Octal 8D-8D-8D mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200427175536.2mmei2fy6f7bg6jm@yadavpratyush.com>
Date:   Mon, 27 Apr 2020 23:25:36 +0530
From:   Pratyush Yadav <me@...avpratyush.com>
To:     Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
Cc:     Mason Yang <masonccyang@...c.com.tw>, vigneshr@...com,
        tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com, juliensu@...c.com.tw, richard@....at,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
        broonie@...nel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] mtd: spi-nor: Add support for Octal 8D-8D-8D mode

On 21/04/20 09:23AM, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> +Pratyush who's working on a similar patchet [1].
> 
> Hello Mason,
> 
> On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 14:39:42 +0800
> Mason Yang <masonccyang@...c.com.tw> wrote:
> 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > This is repost of patchset from Boris Brezillon's
> > [RFC,00/18] mtd: spi-nor: Proposal for 8-8-8 mode support [1].
> 
> I only quickly went through the patches you sent and saying it's a
> repost of the RFC is a bit of a lie. You completely ignored the state
> tracking I was trying to do to avoid leaving the flash in 8D mode when
> suspending/resetting the board, and I think that part is crucial. If I
> remember correctly, we already had this discussion so I must say I'm a
> bit disappointed.
> 
> Can you sync with Pratyush? I think his series [1] is better in that it
> tries to restore the flash in single-SPI mode before suspend (it's
> missing the shutdown case, but that can be easily added I think). Of
> course that'd be even better to have proper state tracking at the SPI
> NOR level.

Hi Mason,

I posted a re-roll of my series here [0]. Could you please base your 
changes on top of it? Let me know if the series is missing something you 
need.
 
[0]  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mtd/20200424184410.8578-1-p.yadav@ti.com/

-- 
Regards,
Pratyush Yadav