[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200428164155.GB12860@linux-8ccs.fritz.box>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 18:41:55 +0200
From: Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc: live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/10] module: Remove module_disable_ro()
+++ Josh Poimboeuf [28/04/20 11:36 -0500]:
>On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 06:25:05PM +0200, Jessica Yu wrote:
>> +++ Josh Poimboeuf [25/04/20 06:07 -0500]:
>> > module_disable_ro() has no more users. Remove it.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
>> > Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
>>
>> Hm, I guess this means we can also remove the module_enable_ro() stubs
>> in module.h and make it a static function again (like the other
>> module_enable_* functions) as there are no more outside users. I have to
>> remind myself after this patchset is merged :-)
>
>Ah, true. I'm respinning the patch set anyway, I can just add this as a
>another patch.
That would be great. Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists