linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/13] arm: dts: s5pv210: Correct FIMC definitions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BN6PR04MB06604F79534ACDC1B9858C8AA3AC0@BN6PR04MB0660.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Tue, 28 Apr 2020 15:31:07 -0700
From:   Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@...e.ca>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc:     kgene@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] arm: dts: s5pv210: Correct FIMC definitions

Hi Krzysztof,

On 2020-04-28 3:32 a.m., Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 11:36:03AM -0700, Jonathan Bakker wrote:
>> The extended mainscaler is only available on FIMC1 and there
>> are minimum pixel alignments that differ from the default.
>> Additionally, the cam-if interface is available on all three
>> while FIMC2 has no rotators.  The lcd-wb interface is supported
>> on FIMC1.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@...e.ca>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi | 13 ++++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi
>> index b3b6ad2889f9..3cbf6c05f42a 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210.dtsi
>> @@ -626,7 +626,7 @@
>>  				clock-names = "fimc",
>>  						"sclk_fimc";
>>  				samsung,pix-limits = <4224 8192 1920 4224>;
>> -				samsung,mainscaler-ext;
>> +				samsung,min-pix-alignment = <16 8>;
>>  				samsung,cam-if;
>>  			};
>>  
>> @@ -639,9 +639,11 @@
>>  						<&clocks SCLK_FIMC1>;
>>  				clock-names = "fimc",
>>  						"sclk_fimc";
>> -				samsung,pix-limits = <4224 8192 1920 4224>;
>>  				samsung,mainscaler-ext;
>> +				samsung,min-pix-alignment = <1 1>;
>> +				samsung,pix-limits = <4224 8192 1920 4224>;
> 
> The line just moved around. I guess this was not intended?

Correct, will fix in v2.

> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 

Thanks,
Jonathan