[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200428084301.GC20640@amd>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 10:43:01 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
Cc: jacek.anaszewski@...il.com, linux-leds@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 02/17] leds: Add multicolor ID to the color ID list
On Mon 2020-04-27 12:12:18, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Pavel
>
> On 4/25/20 2:52 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >On Thu 2020-04-23 10:55:09, Dan Murphy wrote:
> >>Add a new color ID that is declared as MULTICOLOR as with the
> >>multicolor framework declaring a definitive color is not accurate
> >>as the node can contain multiple colors.
> >>
> >>Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>
> >Please merge with previous patch, and you can keep reviews.
>
> Not sure we should do that. The previous patches deals directly with the
> bindings and this is code.
>
> I thought the rule was to keep bindings and code separated.
>
> It made sense to squash the bindings header patch to the bindings document
> patch but it does not make sense to squash this patch to the bindings.
>
> Please let me know if you want me to proceed with the squash.
Well, OTOH it seems wrong to have array that is only
half-initialized... But it is not a big deal.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists