[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <38e1a926-53a6-bda6-cb07-2614f4c682ba@web.de>
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 12:52:59 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Matteo Croce <mcroce@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] checkpatch: add dedicated checker for 'Fixes:' tag
> And there is no 'Fixes:' tag format checker in checkpatch
I have taken another look at corresponding implementation details.
Will programming challenges get any more attention?
> to check the commit id length too,
The mentioned script contains the following information.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/scripts/checkpatch.pl?id=b240f960afb900e59112ebcfa5a759bb0a85a14e#n2818
# Check for git id commit length and improperly formed commit descriptions
> so let's add dedicated checker to check these conditions for 'Fixes:' tag.
How do you think about to reconsider the usage of the word “checker”
at specific places?
> + my $id = '0123456789ab';
> + my $orig_desc = "commit description";
* Do you try to extend the existing software analysis approach “GIT_COMMIT_ID”?
* Would you like to avoid the development of duplicate Perl code?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists