[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dec3d317-8381-a4d9-efb9-0418f9b42a55@web.de>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:45:11 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
Matteo Croce <mcroce@...hat.com>,
Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [v3] checkpatch: add dedicated checker for 'Fixes:' tag
> btw: I suggested this patch last year.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/40bfc40958fca6e2cc9b86101153aa0715fac4f7.camel@perches.com/
Thanks for this link to the previous discussion topic “linux-next:
Fixes tag needs some work in the tip tree”.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/1/17/966
With which script did you determine the presented statistic for variations
in the usage of details for such tags?
Will another update become interesting how often shorter commit identifiers
are still published for Linux patches?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists