lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 29 Apr 2020 08:45:11 +0200
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
        Matteo Croce <mcroce@...hat.com>,
        Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [v3] checkpatch: add dedicated checker for 'Fixes:' tag

> btw:  I suggested this patch last year.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/40bfc40958fca6e2cc9b86101153aa0715fac4f7.camel@perches.com/

Thanks for this link to the previous discussion topic “linux-next:
Fixes tag needs some work in the tip tree”.
https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/1/17/966

With which script did you determine the presented statistic for variations
in the usage of details for such tags?

Will another update become interesting how often shorter commit identifiers
are still published for Linux patches?

Regards,
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ