[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0e2c9a6a-aa21-7814-9af8-629de6568fab@st.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 11:27:43 +0200
From: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
CC: <richard@....at>, <vigneshr@...com>, <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <mark.rutland@....com>, <tony@...mide.com>,
<linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <marex@...x.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] mtd: rawnand: stm32_fmc2: use FMC2_TIMEOUT_MS
for timeouts
Hi Miquèl,
On 4/27/20 8:22 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
>
> Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...com> wrote on Wed, 15 Apr
> 2020 17:57:30 +0200:
>
>> This patch removes the constant FMC2_TIMEOUT_US.
>> FMC2_TIMEOUT_MS is set to 5 seconds and this constant is used
>> each time that we need to wait (except when the timeout value
>> is set by the framework)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c | 11 +++++------
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c
>> index ab53314..f159c39 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/stm32_fmc2_nand.c
>> @@ -37,8 +37,7 @@
>> /* Max ECC buffer length */
>> #define FMC2_MAX_ECC_BUF_LEN (FMC2_BCHDSRS_LEN * FMC2_MAX_SG)
>>
>> -#define FMC2_TIMEOUT_US 1000
>> -#define FMC2_TIMEOUT_MS 1000
>> +#define FMC2_TIMEOUT_MS 5000
>>
>> /* Timings */
>> #define FMC2_THIZ 1
>> @@ -525,9 +524,9 @@ static int stm32_fmc2_ham_calculate(struct nand_chip *chip, const u8 *data,
>> u32 sr, heccr;
>> int ret;
>>
>> - ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout(fmc2->io_base + FMC2_SR,
>> - sr, sr & FMC2_SR_NWRF, 10,
>> - FMC2_TIMEOUT_MS);
>> + ret = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(fmc2->io_base + FMC2_SR,
>> + sr, sr & FMC2_SR_NWRF, 1,
>> + 1000 * FMC2_TIMEOUT_MS);
>
> Is the _atomic suffix needed here? If yes it would deserve a separate
> patch with Fixes/Stable tags.
>
I have currently not seen any issues. So, I will remove this
modification as we will move to regmap_read_poll_timeout in patch 10.
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(fmc2->dev, "ham timeout\n");
>> return ret;
>> @@ -1315,7 +1314,7 @@ static int stm32_fmc2_waitrdy(struct nand_chip *chip, unsigned long timeout_ms)
>> /* Check if there is no pending requests to the NAND flash */
>> if (readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(fmc2->io_base + FMC2_SR, sr,
>> sr & FMC2_SR_NWRF, 1,
>> - FMC2_TIMEOUT_US))
>> + 1000 * FMC2_TIMEOUT_MS))
>> dev_warn(fmc2->dev, "Waitrdy timeout\n");
>>
>> /* Wait tWB before R/B# signal is low */
>
> You change the timeouts from 1ms to 5s.
>
> Maybe 5s is a little bit too much IMHO but we don't really care as this
> is a timeout. However 1ms is tight. If you are changing this value
> because it triggers error (eg. when the machine is loaded), then it is
> a fix and should appear like it.
>
> Thanks,
> Miquèl
>
No errors currently happens.
During our stress tests, in a overloaded system, we have seen that we
could be close to 1 second, even if we never met this value.
So, to be safe, I have set this timeout to 5 seconds.
As it is just a timeout value, I have not seen any side effect.
I am using the same timeout constant to avoid to have one timeout per
cases.
Regards,
Christophe Kerello.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists