[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200429094201.GA2557@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 11:42:01 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Jeremy Kerr <jk@...abs.org>,
"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fixup! signal: factor copy_siginfo_to_external32 from
copy_siginfo_to_user32
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 10:07:11AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > What do you think of this version? This one always overrides
> > copy_siginfo_to_user32 for the x86 compat case to keep the churn down,
> > and improves the copy_siginfo_to_external32 documentation a bit.
>
> Looks good to me. I preferred checking for X32 explicitly (so we can
> find and kill off the #ifdef if we ever remove X32 for good), but there is
> little difference in the end.
Is there any realistic chance we'll get rid of x32?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists