linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: Document proper return value for gpio drivers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdbHAFiarn8Gn618cuMZpyEkPBkzDZO4-xR4hYd_jNXKdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 29 Apr 2020 14:16:05 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpio: Document proper return value for gpio drivers

On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 2:24 AM Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:

> The legacy defines GPIOF_DIR_XXX are only for consumers. Document the
> proper ones.  Also: don't use "_XXX" since that's harder to find with
> "git grep".  Just list both of the values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>

Patch applied! Sorry for the historical confusion.

Yours,
Linus Walleij