linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: Make "offset" and "unsigned int", not just "unsigned"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 29 Apr 2020 14:19:35 +0200
From:   Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:     Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: Make "offset" and "unsigned int", not just "unsigned"

On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 2:24 AM Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:

> When I copied the function prototypes from the GPIO header file into
> my own driver, checkpatch yelled at me saying that I shouldn't use use
> "unsigned" but instead should say "unsigned int".  Let's make the
> header file use "unsigned int" so others who copy like I did won't get
> yelled at.
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>

Patch applied. Nice cleanup!

Yours,
Linus Walleij