[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200429103216.34b6f7aa@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 10:32:16 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shile Zhang <shile.zhang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Tzvetomir Stoyanov <tz.stoyanov@...il.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] x86/mm: Sync all vmalloc mappings before
text_poke()
On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 16:10:04 +0200
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 10:07:31AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Talking with Mathieu about this on IRC, he pointed out that my code does
> > have a vzalloc() that is called:
> >
> > in trace_pid_write()
> >
> > pid_list->pids = vzalloc((pid_list->pid_max + 7) >> 3);
> >
> > This is done when -P1,2 is on the trace-cmd command line.
>
> Yeah, I was guessing something like this, init_mm has a mapping which
> poking_mm has not. I currently try to reproduce this on one of my
> machines.
Note, in use_temporary_mm(poking_mm), poking_mm only contains the page that
needs to be updated. But will get added to per_cpu(cpu_tlbstate.loaded_mm),
which appears to be the one that's not updated.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists