[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200430105514.GC19464@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 16:25:15 +0530
From: Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@...eaurora.org>
To: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Wei Wang <wvw@...gle.com>, Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>,
Alessio Balsini <balsini@...gle.com>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@...bug.net>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] sched/deadline: Optimize dl_bw_cpus()
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:37:05AM +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> Return the weight of the rd (root domain) span in case it is a subset
> of the cpu_active_mask.
>
> Continue to compute the number of CPUs over rd span and cpu_active_mask
> when in hotplug.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index 504d2f51b0d6..4ae22bfc37ae 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -54,10 +54,16 @@ static inline struct dl_bw *dl_bw_of(int i)
> static inline int dl_bw_cpus(int i)
> {
> struct root_domain *rd = cpu_rq(i)->rd;
> - int cpus = 0;
> + int cpus;
>
> RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_sched_held(),
> "sched RCU must be held");
> +
> + if (cpumask_subset(rd->span, cpu_active_mask))
> + return cpumask_weight(rd->span);
> +
Looks good to me. This is a nice optimization.
> + cpus = 0;
> +
> for_each_cpu_and(i, rd->span, cpu_active_mask)
> cpus++;
>
Do you know why this check is in place? Is it only to cover
the case of cpuset_cpu_inactive()->dl_cpu_busy()?
Thanks,
Pavan
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists