[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200430105529.GH19932@willie-the-truck>
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 11:55:30 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Łukasz Stelmach <l.stelmach@...sung.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: kexec_file: print appropriate variable
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:50:34PM +0200, Łukasz Stelmach wrote:
> Fixes: 4312057681929 ("arm64: kexec_file: load initrd and device-tree")
> Signed-off-by: Łukasz Stelmach <l.stelmach@...sung.com>
-ENOCOMMITMSG
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
> index b40c3b0def92..2776bdaa83a5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c
> @@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ int load_other_segments(struct kimage *image,
> image->arch.dtb_mem = kbuf.mem;
>
> pr_debug("Loaded dtb at 0x%lx bufsz=0x%lx memsz=0x%lx\n",
> - kbuf.mem, dtb_len, dtb_len);
> + kbuf.mem, dtb_len, kbuf.memsz);
I guess it would make sense to use kbuf.bufsz instead of dtb_len too.
(assuming this is useful to somebody?)
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists