linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 04/10] loop: Refactor loop_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 1 May 2020 21:33:23 +0200
From:   Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
        Narayan Kamath <narayan@...gle.com>,
        Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        Martijn Coenen <maco@...gle.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@....com>,
        Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/10] loop: Refactor loop_set_status() size calculation

On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 7:30 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> For some reason this fails to apply for me against both
> Jens' for-5.8/block and Linus' current tree.
>
> What is the baseline for this series?

This was based on Linus' tree from a week or two ago or so, but I
think you're most likely missing this one?

https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/31/755

(I mentioned it in the cover letter, but can make it a part of this
series if you prefer).