[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200506051039.GA9983@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 07:10:39 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
Narayan Kamath <narayan@...gle.com>,
Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@...gle.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
Martijn Coenen <maco@...gle.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <Chaitanya.Kulkarni@....com>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/10] loop: Refactor loop_set_status() size
calculation
On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 09:33:23PM +0200, Martijn Coenen wrote:
> On Fri, May 1, 2020 at 7:30 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> >
> > For some reason this fails to apply for me against both
> > Jens' for-5.8/block and Linus' current tree.
> >
> > What is the baseline for this series?
>
> This was based on Linus' tree from a week or two ago or so, but I
> think you're most likely missing this one?
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/3/31/755
>
> (I mentioned it in the cover letter, but can make it a part of this
> series if you prefer).
Yes, I missed that one.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists