linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] mm: separate PageHighMem() and PageHighMemZone() use case

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 1 May 2020 05:30:52 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     js1304@...il.com
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Laura Abbott <labbott@...hat.com>,
        "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@....com>,
        Huang Rui <ray.huang@....com>,
        Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, kernel-team@....com,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] mm: separate PageHighMem() and
 PageHighMemZone() use case

On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 12:26:40PM +0900, js1304@...il.com wrote:
> From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
> 
> Until now, PageHighMem() is used for two different cases. One is to check
> if there is a direct mapping for this page or not. The other is to check
> the zone of this page, that is, weather it is the highmem type zone or not.
> 
> Now, we have separate functions, PageHighMem() and PageHighMemZone() for
> each cases. Use appropriate one.
> 
> Note that there are some rules to determine the proper macro.
> 
> 1. If PageHighMem() is called for checking if the direct mapping exists
> or not, use PageHighMem().
> 2. If PageHighMem() is used to predict the previous gfp_flags for
> this page, use PageHighMemZone(). The zone of the page is related to
> the gfp_flags.
> 3. If purpose of calling PageHighMem() is to count highmem page and
> to interact with the system by using this count, use PageHighMemZone().
> This counter is usually used to calculate the available memory for an
> kernel allocation and pages on the highmem zone cannot be available
> for an kernel allocation.
> 4. Otherwise, use PageHighMemZone(). It's safe since it's implementation
> is just copy of the previous PageHighMem() implementation and won't
> be changed.
> 
> I apply the rule #3 for this patch.
> 
> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
> ---
>  mm/memory_hotplug.c | 2 +-
>  mm/page_alloc.c     | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> index 555137b..891c214 100644
> --- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> +++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
> @@ -593,7 +593,7 @@ void generic_online_page(struct page *page, unsigned int order)
>  	__free_pages_core(page, order);
>  	totalram_pages_add(1UL << order);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
> -	if (PageHighMem(page))
> +	if (PageHighMemZone(page))
>  		totalhigh_pages_add(1UL << order);
>  #endif
>  }
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index fc5919e..7fe5115 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -7444,7 +7444,7 @@ void adjust_managed_page_count(struct page *page, long count)
>  	atomic_long_add(count, &page_zone(page)->managed_pages);
>  	totalram_pages_add(count);
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HIGHMEM
> -	if (PageHighMem(page))
> +	if (PageHighMemZone(page))
>  		totalhigh_pages_add(count);
>  #endif

This function already uses the page_zone structure above, I think
life would be easier of you compare against that, as that makes
the code more obvious.