[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200504031036.GB16070@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 20:10:36 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 18/25] mm: Allow large pages to be added to the page
cache
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 06:36:50AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> @@ -886,7 +906,7 @@ static int __add_to_page_cache_locked(struct page *page,
> /* Leave page->index set: truncation relies upon it */
> if (!huge)
> mem_cgroup_cancel_charge(page, memcg, false);
> - put_page(page);
> + page_ref_sub(page, nr);
> return xas_error(&xas);
> }
> ALLOW_ERROR_INJECTION(__add_to_page_cache_locked, ERRNO);
This is wrong. page_ref_sub() will not call __put_page() if the refcount
gets to zero. What do people prefer?
- put_page(page);
(a)
+ put_thp(page);
(b)
+ put_page_nr(page, nr);
(c)
+ if (page_ref_sub_return(page, nr) == 0)
+ __put_page(page);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists