[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6c47f731-7bff-f186-da55-7ce6cffacdc3@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 10:16:40 -0600
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Tim Waugh <tim@...erelk.net>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] hfsplus: stop using ioctl_by_bdev
On 4/25/20 1:57 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> if (HFSPLUS_SB(sb)->session >= 0) {
> + struct cdrom_tocentry te;
> +
> + if (!cdi)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> te.cdte_track = HFSPLUS_SB(sb)->session;
> te.cdte_format = CDROM_LBA;
> - res = ioctl_by_bdev(sb->s_bdev,
> - CDROMREADTOCENTRY, (unsigned long)&te);
> - if (!res && (te.cdte_ctrl & CDROM_DATA_TRACK) == 4) {
> - *start = (sector_t)te.cdte_addr.lba << 2;
> - return 0;
> + if (cdrom_read_tocentry(cdi, &te) ||
> + (te.cdte_ctrl & CDROM_DATA_TRACK) != 4) {
> + pr_err("invalid session number or type of track\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
I must be missing something obvious from just looking over the patches,
but how does this work if cdrom is modular and hfsplus is builtin?
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists