lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6c47f731-7bff-f186-da55-7ce6cffacdc3@kernel.dk>
Date:   Mon, 4 May 2020 10:16:40 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Tim Waugh <tim@...erelk.net>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] hfsplus: stop using ioctl_by_bdev

On 4/25/20 1:57 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>  	if (HFSPLUS_SB(sb)->session >= 0) {
> +		struct cdrom_tocentry te;
> +
> +		if (!cdi)
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +
>  		te.cdte_track = HFSPLUS_SB(sb)->session;
>  		te.cdte_format = CDROM_LBA;
> -		res = ioctl_by_bdev(sb->s_bdev,
> -			CDROMREADTOCENTRY, (unsigned long)&te);
> -		if (!res && (te.cdte_ctrl & CDROM_DATA_TRACK) == 4) {
> -			*start = (sector_t)te.cdte_addr.lba << 2;
> -			return 0;
> +		if (cdrom_read_tocentry(cdi, &te) ||
> +		    (te.cdte_ctrl & CDROM_DATA_TRACK) != 4) {
> +			pr_err("invalid session number or type of track\n");
> +			return -EINVAL;
>  		}

I must be missing something obvious from just looking over the patches,
but how does this work if cdrom is modular and hfsplus is builtin?

-- 
Jens Axboe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ