[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 10:25:20 -0700
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>,
dm-devel <dm-devel@...hat.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
linux-raid <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mm/swap: use SECTORS_PER_PAGE_SHIFT to clean up code
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 07:55:41PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote:
> +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
> @@ -177,8 +177,8 @@ static int discard_swap(struct swap_info_struct *si)
>
> /* Do not discard the swap header page! */
> se = first_se(si);
> - start_block = (se->start_block + 1) << (PAGE_SHIFT - 9);
> - nr_blocks = ((sector_t)se->nr_pages - 1) << (PAGE_SHIFT - 9);
> + start_block = (se->start_block + 1) << SECTORS_PER_PAGE_SHIFT;
> + nr_blocks = ((sector_t)se->nr_pages - 1) << SECTORS_PER_PAGE_SHIFT;
Thinking about this some more, wouldn't this look better?
start_block = page_sectors(se->start_block + 1);
nr_block = page_sectors(se->nr_pages - 1);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists