linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 01/25] dma-mapping: add generic helpers for mapping sgtable objects

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 5 May 2020 12:44:48 +0200
From:   Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/25] dma-mapping: add generic helpers for mapping
 sgtable objects

Hi Christoph,

On 05.05.2020 12:22, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> +static inline int dma_map_sgtable_attrs(struct device *dev,
>> +	struct sg_table *sgt, enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
> Two tab indents for parameter continuation, please.
>
> Can we also skip the separate _attrs version?  The existing ones have the
> separate _attrs variant as there were pre-existing versions without the
> attrs argument and lots of users, but that doesn't really apply here as
> an extra 0 argument isn't really an issue.

Okay.

>> +static inline size_t iommu_map_sgtable(struct iommu_domain *domain,
>> +			unsigned long iova, struct sg_table *sgt, int prot)
>> +{
>> +	return iommu_map_sg(domain, iova, sgt->sgl, sgt->orig_nents, prot);
>> +}
> Should this be a separate patch due to the different subsystems?
>
> FYI, I'll happily pick up the prep patches in an immutable branch of
> the dma-mapping tree one we have settled on the details.

Okay.

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland