lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 05 May 2020 15:16:10 +0200 From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Cc: x86@...nel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@...cle.com>, Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org> Subject: [patch V4 part 1 08/36] x86/doublefault: Remove memmove() call Use of memmove() in #DF is problematic considered tracing and other instrumentation. Remove the memmove() call and simply write out what needs doing; this even clarifies the code, win-win! The code copies from the espfix64 stack to the normal task stack, there is no possible way for that to overlap. Survives selftests/x86, specifically sigreturn_64. Suggested-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200220121727.GB507@zn.tnic --- arch/x86/kernel/traps.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/traps.c @@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ dotraplinkage void do_double_fault(struc regs->ip == (unsigned long)native_irq_return_iret) { struct pt_regs *gpregs = (struct pt_regs *)this_cpu_read(cpu_tss_rw.x86_tss.sp0) - 1; + unsigned long *p = (unsigned long *)regs->sp; /* * regs->sp points to the failing IRET frame on the @@ -285,7 +286,11 @@ dotraplinkage void do_double_fault(struc * in gpregs->ss through gpregs->ip. * */ - memmove(&gpregs->ip, (void *)regs->sp, 5*8); + gpregs->ip = p[0]; + gpregs->cs = p[1]; + gpregs->flags = p[2]; + gpregs->sp = p[3]; + gpregs->ss = p[4]; gpregs->orig_ax = 0; /* Missing (lost) #GP error code */ /*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists