[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200506093524.GA497896@myrica>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 11:35:24 +0200
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
eugene.volanschi@...ia.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/virtio: reverse arguments to list_add
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 08:47:47PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> Elsewhere in the file, there is a list_for_each_entry with
> &vdev->resv_regions as the second argument, suggesting that
> &vdev->resv_regions is the list head. So exchange the
> arguments on the list_add call to put the list head in the
> second argument.
>
> Fixes: 2a5a31487445 ("iommu/virtio: Add probe request")
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@...ia.fr>
Thanks for the fix. The reason this hasn't blown up so far is
iommu_alloc_resv_region() initializes region->list, but adding more than
one item would break the list.
Reviewed-by: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
> index d5cac4f46ca5..4e1d11af23c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c
> @@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ static int viommu_add_resv_mem(struct viommu_endpoint *vdev,
> if (!region)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - list_add(&vdev->resv_regions, ®ion->list);
> + list_add(®ion->list, &vdev->resv_regions);
> return 0;
> }
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists