[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200506093441.GB34497@piout.net>
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 11:34:41 +0200
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To: Samuel Zou <zou_wei@...wei.com>
Cc: a.zummo@...ertech.it, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] rtc: pcf8523: Use PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO() to simplify
code
Hi,
On 06/05/2020 17:34:00+0800, Samuel Zou wrote:
> Fixes coccicheck warning:
>
> drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8523.c:361:1-3: WARNING: PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO can be used
>
I'm not taking this change because it is useless and will have to be
revert as soon as the probe function changes (and it will).
Does it really simplifies the code? I very much doubt so.
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Zou <zou_wei@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8523.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8523.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8523.c
> index 47e0f41..da8889a 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8523.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8523.c
> @@ -358,10 +358,8 @@ static int pcf8523_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>
> rtc = devm_rtc_device_register(&client->dev, DRIVER_NAME,
> &pcf8523_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
> - if (IS_ERR(rtc))
> - return PTR_ERR(rtc);
>
> - return 0;
> + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(rtc);
> }
>
> static const struct i2c_device_id pcf8523_id[] = {
> --
> 2.6.2
>
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists