lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 6 May 2020 17:36:51 +0800
From:   Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Xiongfeng Wang <wangxiongfeng2@...wei.com>
CC:     <rjw@...ysocki.net>, <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] cpufreq: add support for HiSilicon SoC HIP09

Hi Sudeep,

On 2020/4/30 17:55, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 02:19:59PM +0800, Xiongfeng Wang wrote:
>> HiSilicon SoC has a separate System Control Processor(SCP) dedicated for
>> clock frequency adjustment and has been using the cpufreq driver
>> 'cppc-cpufreq'. New HiSilicon SoC HIP09 add support for CPU Boost, but
>> ACPI CPPC doesn't support this. In HiSilicon SoC HIP09, each core has
>> its own clock domain. It is better for the core itself to adjust its
>> frequency when we require fast response. In this patch, we add a
>> separate cpufreq driver for HiSilicon SoC HIP09.
>>
> 
> I disagree with this approach unless you have tried to extend the CPPC
> in ACPI to accommodate this boost feature you need. Until you show those
> efforts and disagreement to do that from ASWG, I am NACKing this approach.

Unfortunately we are not in ASWG at now, could you please give some
help about extending CPPC in ACPI to support boost feature?

Thanks
Hanjun

Powered by blists - more mailing lists