[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <83ab4ca4-9c34-4cdd-4413-3b4cdf96727d@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 14:54:09 -0500
From: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Calvin Johnson <calvin.johnson@....nxp.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux.cj@...il.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Cristi Sovaiala <cristian.sovaiala@....com>,
Florin Laurentiu Chiculita <florinlaurentiu.chiculita@....com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@....nxp.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
Varun Sethi <V.Sethi@....com>,
"Rajesh V . Bikkina" <rajesh.bikkina@....com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Diana Madalina Craciun <diana.craciun@....com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>,
Makarand Pawagi <makarand.pawagi@....com>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.bansal@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v3 4/5] net: phy: Introduce fwnode_get_phy_id()
Hi,
On 5/7/20 12:27 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 4:26 PM Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com> wrote:
>> On 5/5/20 8:29 AM, Calvin Johnson wrote:
>
>>> + if (sscanf(cp, "ethernet-phy-id%4x.%4x",
>>> + &upper, &lower) == 2) {
>>> + *phy_id = ((upper & 0xFFFF) << 16) | (lower & 0xFFFF);
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>
>> Isn't the ACPI _CID() conceptually similar to the DT compatible
>> property?
>
> Where?
Not, sure I understand exactly what your asking. AFAIK, in general the
dt property is used to select a device driver/etc based on a more to
less compatible set of substrings. The phy case is a bit different
because it codes a numerical part number into the string rather than
just using arbitrary strings to select a driver and device. But it uses
that as a vendor selector for binding to the correct driver/device.
Rephrasing the ACPI spec, the _CID() is either a single compatible id,
or a list of ids in order of preference. Each id is either a HID (string
or EISA type id) or a bus specific string encoding vendor/device/etc.
(https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.7-rc4/source/drivers/acpi/acpica/utids.c#L186).
One of the examples is "PCI\VEN_vvvv&DEV_dddd"
So that latter case seems to be almost exactly what we have here.
>
>> It even appears to be getting used in a similar way to
>> identify particular phy drivers in this case.
>
> _CID() is a string. It can't be used as pure number.
>
It does have a numeric version defined for EISA types. OTOH I suspect
that your right. If there were a "PHY\VEN_IDvvvv&ID_DDDD" definition, it
may not be ideal to parse it. Instead the normal ACPI model of exactly
matching the complete string in the phy driver might be more appropriate.
Similarly to how I suspect the next patch's use of "compatible" isn't
ideal either, because whether a device is c45 or not, should tend to be
fixed to a particular vendor/device implementation and not a firmware
provided property.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists