[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200507070736.25418-1-zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 15:07:36 +0800
From: Zheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@...wei.com>
To: <rjw@...ysocki.net>, <lenb@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<zhengzengkai@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next] ACPI: debug: Make two functions static
Fix sparse warnings:
drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c:748:12: warning:
symbol 'acpi_aml_init' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c:774:13: warning:
symbol 'acpi_aml_exit' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@...wei.com>
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c
index 7a265c2171c0..6041974c7627 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_dbg.c
@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ static const struct acpi_debugger_ops acpi_aml_debugger = {
.notify_command_complete = acpi_aml_notify_command_complete,
};
-int __init acpi_aml_init(void)
+static int __init acpi_aml_init(void)
{
int ret;
@@ -771,7 +771,7 @@ int __init acpi_aml_init(void)
return 0;
}
-void __exit acpi_aml_exit(void)
+static void __exit acpi_aml_exit(void)
{
if (acpi_aml_initialized) {
acpi_unregister_debugger(&acpi_aml_debugger);
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists