[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200507114514.11589-1-bernard@vivo.com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 04:45:14 -0700
From: Bernard Zhao <bernard@...o.com>
To: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>, Kukjin Kim <kgene@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: opensource.kernel@...o.com, Bernard Zhao <bernard@...o.com>
Subject: [PATCH] memory/samsung: Maybe wrong triming parameter
In function create_timings_aligned, all the max is to use
dmc->min_tck->xxx, aligned with val dmc->timings->xxx.
But the dmc->timings->tFAW use dmc->min_tck->tXP?
Maybe this point is wrong parameter useing.
Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <bernard@...o.com>
---
drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c b/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c
index 81a1b1d01683..22a43d662833 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos5422-dmc.c
@@ -1091,7 +1091,7 @@ static int create_timings_aligned(struct exynos5_dmc *dmc, u32 *reg_timing_row,
/* power related timings */
val = dmc->timings->tFAW / clk_period_ps;
val += dmc->timings->tFAW % clk_period_ps ? 1 : 0;
- val = max(val, dmc->min_tck->tXP);
+ val = max(val, dmc->min_tck->tFAW);
reg = &timing_power[0];
*reg_timing_power |= TIMING_VAL2REG(reg, val);
--
2.26.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists